Tools
You need clear, practical guidance to protect your systems as computing advances. Modern breaches usually start with human mistakes, but a powerful future quantum computer could also break widely used public-key methods.
Timelines matter. NIST warns of potential compromises by 2030, and experts like Dr. Michele Mosca estimate rising odds within a few years. That makes planning a priority for your data and compliance teams.
This guide shows why current cryptography, while strong today, must evolve for the quantum era. You’ll get practical steps—what to inventory, where to prioritize, and how vendors like IBM are already offering PQC on systems such as the IBM z16 to help shorten your path to safe adoption.
Key Takeaways
- Start planning now: timelines from NIST and experts suggest near-term risk.
- Focus on long-lived data and high-value systems first.
- Inventory keys and cryptographic dependencies before migration.
- Consider hybrid approaches that pair current methods with post-quantum options.
- Leverage vendor services and tested platforms to reduce disruption.
- Create a phased budget and rollout plan tied to business risk.
Why the quantum era changes your data security priorities
The coming quantum era forces you to rethink which data and systems deserve top-tier protection. Experts warn there may be only 8–10 years before a quantum computer can threaten widely used public-key methods, and NIST highlights possible first breaches around 2030.
Attackers are already harvesting traffic today with plans to decrypt it in the future. That means long-lived records, legal files, health data, and intellectual property must move to the top of your list now.
Treat this as a strategic security effort. Build a staged, multi-year roadmap that aligns with hardware refresh cycles and certificate renewals. Get executive sponsorship and set clear risk-acceptance thresholds.
- Prioritize communications that must stay confidential for years.
- Shift from reactive fixes to crypto-agility, continuous discovery, and staged rollouts.
- Train teams on new processes so uptime and compliance stay steady as you update systems.
Framing the work as measurable, phased steps helps secure board buy-in and controls cost. The threat from quantum mechanics is strategic, not hypothetical — early planning reduces risk and avoids rushed, costly changes later.
From theory to threat: how quantum computers break today’s cryptography
The math behind quantum machines changes the security landscape you rely on. Shor’s algorithm makes factorization and discrete logarithms tractable on a powerful quantum device, which threatens RSA, Diffie-Hellman, and ECC.
Shor’s and Grover’s: practical impacts
Shor’s algorithm lets quantum computers solve number-theory problems that underlie most public key systems. That means keys you trust today can be exposed when capable machines arrive.
Grover’s algorithm speeds brute force against symmetric ciphers, effectively cutting key strength in half. You should consider moving to larger symmetric keys like AES-256 to restore margin.
Harvest now, decrypt later
Adversaries already capture and hoard encrypted traffic with the plan to decrypt it later when quantum computers solve those hard problems.
Encrypted data sent today—backups, VPN tunnels, and archived communications—can be at risk years from now if you delay action.
Timelines and risk windows
NIST flags credible breach risks around 2030, and experts give earlier probabilities. Dr. Michele Mosca estimates a 1-in-7 chance by 2026 and 50% by 2031.
“Harvest now, decrypt later” is already observed in traffic hoarding and should drive your priority list.
- Assume Shor will break current public key schemes once machines scale.
- Harden symmetric keys now and phase in hybrid key exchange.
- Prioritize long-lived assets and align upgrades with certificate rotations.
Encryption fundamentals you can’t skip in the quantum future
Knowing which systems use public key math and which use symmetric ciphers is the first practical step toward readiness. You need a compact map of where keys, certificates, and bulk ciphers sit across your estate.
Asymmetric versus symmetric cryptography in your networks and applications
Asymmetric schemes—RSA, DH, and ECC—handle key exchange and identity in TLS, SSH, IPsec, S/MIME, and code signing. These public key mechanisms establish trust and protect session keys.
Symmetric cryptography (for example, AES) protects bulk data at rest and in motion. Grover’s algorithm reduces brute-force margins, so plan for AES-256 for long-lived archives and backups.
Public key basics: key exchange, authentication, and where protocols are used today
Action checklist:
- Inventory where asymmetric crypto handles key exchange and identity (TLS handshakes, SSH auth, VPN tunnels, code signing).
- Map encryption methods to use cases: asymmetric for trust; symmetric for performance and large streams.
- Document protocol versions and cipher suites so you can slot in hybrid or post-quantum options without breaking apps.
- Diagram PKI chains, baseline performance, and adopt crypto-agility patterns to rotate algorithms and keys smoothly.
“Modern breaches often start with human error; quantum computers would change which mathematical problems are practical to solve.”
Coordinate networking, DevOps, and app teams now. Standardize templates and automated policies so upgrades are repeatable and low-risk.
Post-quantum cryptography standards you can plan around
With published PQC standards, your teams can now plan concrete pilots for key exchange and signing.
NIST’s process selected ML-KEM (CRYSTALS-Kyber) for key encapsulation and ML-DSA (CRYSTALS-Dilithium) for signatures. SPHINCS+ (listed here as SLH-DSA) is approved for stateless signing. FALCON (FN-DSA) is slated for future standardization.
NIST PQC standardization: what’s selected and what’s next
Track national institute standards and institute standards technology updates. These publications form the baseline you should follow as guidance evolves.
Algorithms to know
The chosen algorithms move trust from factorization and discrete-log math to lattice-based problems. Research shows these are currently harder for both classical and quantum computers to solve.
Interoperability and performance considerations
- Plan interoperability tests across TLS, VPNs, S/MIME, and code signing.
- Measure handshake sizes, CPU cost, and latency in representative workloads.
- Adopt hybrid modes so services remain compatible while you validate PQC options.
- Sequence rollouts by exposure: external endpoints first, then high-value internal services.
“Standards-first planning reduces surprises and keeps audits aligned with institute standards.”
Tip: Partner with vendors that already integrated PQC (for example, IBM’s work on ML-KEM and ML-DSA in the IBM z16) to speed pilots and reduce risk.
Quantum-safe encryption
Modern defenses mix math-based upgrades with physics-backed key delivery for the highest-value links. You should plan hybrid and layered options that fit your systems and risk profile.
PQC for TLS, VPN, code signing, and S/MIME
ML-KEM (CRYSTALS-Kyber) and ML-DSA (CRYSTALS-Dilithium) can replace vulnerable public-key operations in TLS handshakes, site-to-site VPNs, code signing, and S/MIME.
Practical note: vendors are already shipping support—Fortinet added CRYSTALS-Kyber in FortiOS 7.6—so evaluate platform readiness and test interoperability early.
Quantum Key Distribution: physics-backed key exchange and where it fits
QKD uses core ideas from quantum mechanics—entanglement, uncertainty, and the no-cloning theorem—to detect eavesdropping and deliver symmetric keys over fiber.
For select high-assurance links, QKD complements algorithmic solutions rather than replacing them. JPMorgan Chase’s 100 Gbps IPsec demo over 46 km shows operational viability for specialized infrastructure.
Symmetric hardening and crypto-agility
Harden symmetric layers now: adopt AES-256, increase hash sizes, and validate throughput across your network to blunt Grover-style attacks.
Crypto-agility matters—you want the ability to rotate algorithms and parameters without reworking apps or workflows.
- Deploy PQC where public-key exchange and identity matter most.
- Use QKD selectively for fiber-connected, ultra-sensitive links.
- Harden symmetric ciphers everywhere and plan algorithm rollouts.
For deeper technical context on how quantum computing work impacts protocols and systems, see this guide.
Solution landscape: how leading vendors tackle quantum threats
Leading vendors are turning research into practical products you can pilot this year. They provide solutions that help you map risk, test post-quantum cryptography, and update network gear with minimal disruption.
IBM
IBM has integrated ML-KEM and ML-DSA into the IBM z16 and offers IBM Quantum Safe services to help you discover keys, plan migration, and test at scale. These services give you a clear pathway to modernize mainframe security and keep operations steady during change.
Fortinet
Fortinet added NIST PQC CRYSTALS-Kyber to FortiOS 7.6 so you can field PQC-ready VPNs in routine maintenance windows. This reduces your exposure to harvested traffic while you validate interoperability with existing firewalls and routers.
Note: real-world trials, like the JPMorgan Chase QKD IPsec demo using Fortinet and ID Quantique, show how high-throughput links can layer physics-based key delivery with vendor platforms.
Nokia
Nokia uses a defense-in-depth approach across OTN, Ethernet, MPLS, and IP. Their Quantum-Safe Networks combine AES-256 at the transport layer with automated key orchestration via the 1830 SMS platform to scale and manage keys across your network.
- You can accelerate adoption with IBM’s enterprise approach: z16 plus migration services.
- Consider Fortinet for PQC-ready VPNs to lower short-term risk from future attacks.
- Nokia’s multi-layer strategy helps you fit quantum solutions into existing infrastructure and monitoring.
“Pick vendors that offer crypto-agility, hybrid modes, and clear proof points before production rollouts.”
Bottom line: pilot with two vendors, demand benchmarks, and align vendor roadmaps with NIST so your industry-grade systems stay resilient as quantum threats evolve.
Assess your risk today: what to inventory, measure, and monitor
Start by mapping what you have—keys, certificates, and where sensitive files live—so you can spot long-term risk. IBM recommends that organizations begin with a full asset map because many lack a complete view of cryptographic use. Unknown actors already steal batches of encrypted data to store for future decryption.
Data classification and “time-to-sensitivity”
Classify data by sensitivity and retention. Prioritize communications that must remain confidential for years: legal records, health files, and IP.
Quantify regulatory and contractual exposure so you can justify budgets and timelines.
Cryptographic discovery across your environment
Use automated discovery to find RSA, ECC, and protocol versions on endpoints, servers, apps, and network devices.
Combine scanners with your CMDB and manual checks to cover edge cases and validate results.
- Map where encrypted data is stored and transmitted, including backups and inter-data-center links.
- Baseline network paths—undersea links, WAN, and site-to-site VPNs—to find frequent high-value routes.
- Measure certificate inventories, lifetimes, code signing dependencies, and S/MIME usage for planned rotations.
- Add monitoring for cipher suites, handshake failures, and deprecated algorithms to catch drift early.
“Map assets and cryptographic usage first — it makes later changes faster and less risky.”
Align security and infrastructure teams around a single source of truth. Pilot key orchestration and crypto policy automation to reduce errors and scale multi-layer defenses. Nokia’s multi-layer approach shows how orchestration helps resilience across your network and infrastructure.
Your migration roadmap to quantum-safe cryptography
Begin your migration with a clear map of the channels adversaries are most likely to harvest today. That map directs your priorities and keeps effort focused on the highest-value risk: data captured now to be cracked in the future.
Prioritize “decrypt later” exposure
Start with undersea fiber, inter-DC backbones, site-to-site VPNs, and long-lived certificates. These paths carry sensitive communications and are attractive targets for traffic hoarding.
Action: inventory those endpoints, mark retention windows, and tag assets by time-to-sensitivity so you can sequence work by risk and impact.
Pilot and scale
Run hybrid key exchange pilots that combine classical and post-quantum algorithms to preserve compatibility while you measure performance.
Limit QKD trials to a few critical fiber links first. Validate operations, monitoring, and key management integration before wider rollouts.
Governance and KPIs
Set clear KPIs—latency, handshake success, CPU overhead, and interoperability pass rates. Define pass/fail criteria for go-live and document rollback plans.
- Pre-stage software and enable crypto-agility so you can switch algorithms without downtime.
- Align upgrades with certificate renewals, firmware patches, and hardware refresh cycles to control costs.
- Engage vendors for joint interoperability testing across your network, identity, and application stacks.
“Prioritize assets that attackers would store today to decrypt later; pilot broadly, govern tightly, and scale by criticality.”
Form a cross-functional steering group to meet regularly, track progress, and report status to leadership. Start at the exposed edge, then move inward to internal communications, code signing, and long-term archives over the coming years.
Conclusion
A focused roadmap turns abstract quantum threats into practical projects you can manage.
Start small, act now. Use NIST PQC standards (ML-KEM, ML-DSA, SLH-DSA, FN-DSA) and vendor implementations—IBM z16, FortiOS 7.6 (CRYSTALS-Kyber), and Nokia’s 1830 SMS—to pilot solutions across your network.
Set priorities by time-to-sensitivity. Harden symmetric layers, enable hybrid modes, and protect long-lived links that adversaries may harvest today.
Govern with KPIs, involve security, legal, and engineering, and align updates to renewal windows. This approach gives you a practical, standards-aligned path to quantum-safe encryption and resilient data security into the quantum future.
