Proximity Bias: Overcoming the In-Office vs Remote Inequality

Infographic guide for hybrid teams on overcoming Proximity Bias by SmartKeys, focusing on outcome-based results, inclusive leadership, and equitable career growth for remote workers.

Last Updated on January 10, 2026


You face a real workplace issue when people who sit near leaders get better treatment than remote employees. This tendency shows up in hiring, promotions, and daily assignments. SHRM data from 2021 found many supervisors prefer staff in the office and sometimes forget remote workers when assigning work.

This creates an uneven playing field in hybrid teams. It hurts retention, performance, and fairness for workers across roles. Leaders who equate visibility with effort can favor those nearby even if outcomes match.

At your company, small changes make a big difference. Synchrony Financial asked leaders to work at least one day from home to signal that remote work matters. You can use clear output-based goals, remote-first meeting norms, and simple tracking so people get credit for real contributions.

Key Takeaways

  • You’ll learn what proximity bias is and why it persists in hybrid work.
  • The issue is a business risk that affects employees, retention, and access to opportunities.
  • SHRM data shows managers often favor in-office staff and can forget remote workers.
  • Practical steps include outcome-based reviews, visible tracking, and leadership modeling.
  • Measure progress with engagement data, promotion trends, and regular pulse checks.

Table of Contents

What proximity bias is and why it matters in today’s hybrid workplace

In hybrid teams, who is visible can become a shortcut for who is valued. Proximity bias is the tendency to grant preferential treatment to in-office employees simply because they are seen more often.

This effect comes from mental shortcuts. Managers and leaders overweight what they observe in person and undervalue remote contributions. SHRM research shows supervisors often prefer staff who work on-site and may see remote employees as more replaceable.

The result turns into an access problem. People physically near the office get early information, quick feedback, and face time that leads to better opportunities. That skews performance signals and makes management decisions uneven.

  • The tendency harms retention and misallocates talent across teams.
  • It creates an opportunity gap for caregivers, people with disabilities, and workers outside commuting range.
  • Even without bad intent, treatment differences add up and cost the company real results.

You can fix this by centering evaluations on outputs and by making work and access visible to everyone.

How proximity bias shows up at work: real signs you can spot

You can often tell who the organization favors by watching who gets the quick wins and quiet praise. These signs show up in everyday routines and add up to real career differences for employees and workers.

Preferential treatment tied to visibility: recognition, raises, and promotions

Watch for patterns where recognition and raises go to in-office employees more often than remote employees. Promotions can follow visibility, not objective performance. SHRM found 42% of supervisors sometimes forgot about remote workers when assigning tasks — a red flag for unequal opportunity.

Information gaps and exclusion from meetings, decisions, and social interactions

Office conversations at lunch or in hallways often become early access to resources and decisions. Remote workers hear about changes later and miss informal coaching.

Skewed performance evaluations when presence is mistaken for productivity

Evaluation drift happens when managers praise “always here” instead of measurable results. That language substitutes presence for performance and can push remote employees out of high-impact roles.

Time zone and technology barriers that sideline remote employees

Recurring meetings set to on-site hours, audio or camera issues, and chat inputs being ignored all reduce remote participation. These tech and time problems shape who gets airtime and influence during decisions.

“Document specific examples — who was invited, who presented, who closed the loop — to confirm patterns, not just anecdotes.”

  • You’ll spot calendar clues that favor the office and limit remote participation.
  • You’ll review assignment patterns to see who gets high-impact projects.
  • You’ll track coaching frequency and real-time feedback across the team.

Takeaway: Record concrete examples and run a simple survey to check if your team’s culture and tools give fair access to people in all locations. For a deeper look at building an inclusive work approach, see remote company culture.

How to prevent proximity bias in your hybrid teams

Start by anchoring decisions to measurable outcomes so location doesn’t drive rewards. Define success with clear KPIs, documented deliverables, and a shared tracking tool that shows who completed which project and when.

Set clear, outcome-based performance criteria

Make performance about output, not hours. Use standardized KPIs and written deliverables so managers judge work by results. Track progress in a single place so opportunities and assignments are visible to everyone.

Train managers on inclusive remote leadership

Provide training that helps managers spot unconscious patterns and run inclusive rituals. Teach structured agendas, rotating facilitators, and fair coaching so remote workers get the same development and opportunities as on-site staff.

Adopt remote-first meeting norms

Enforce equal airtime, use chat and hand-raise tools, record sessions, and publish written recaps. These steps create transparent decisions and let remote employees follow up and contribute on equal footing.

Use async tools to make work visible

Rely on project boards, Slack updates, and documented email threads to surface contributions across time zones. Async records make accomplishments verifiable and reduce the temptation to reward whoever is easiest to see.

Build trust with predictable check-ins and role modeling

Schedule regular 1:1s, set smaller iterative goals, and require leaders to rotate work-from-home days as a visible example. Leadership modeling signals that remote work and development are valued.

“Define success by outcomes, document contributions, and make access to resources equal across locations.”

  • You’ll set outcome-based KPIs and track deliverables so performance is judged on impact.
  • You’ll train managers on inclusive practices that protect remote employees’ development.
  • You’ll deploy async tools and meeting norms so decisions and opportunities are transparent.

Measuring and monitoring proximity bias to keep progress on track

Use fast, focused data to tell if people in different places get equal chances. Measurement turns impressions into action so you can fix gaps in how people receive recognition, assignments, and growth.

Use pulse surveys and audits that segment results by work location. Add targeted items such as “I have equal access to growth and development opportunities, regardless of where I work,” “I feel recognized for my contributions by my manager,” and “Decisions that affect my work are communicated clearly and inclusively.”

Use pulse and engagement surveys segmented by work location

Run frequent, short surveys and break results into remote and in-office groups. That shows gaps in access, recognition, and communication that simple impressions can hide.

Track promotions, ratings, and high-impact assignments for equity

Audit promotion rates, performance ratings, and who gets high-impact projects by location. Keep objective records of project outcomes so management can compare like-for-like work and adjust the process or resources where needed.

  • You’ll run segmented pulse and engagement surveys by location to reveal gaps.
  • You’ll track promotions, ratings, and project assignments for fair treatment.
  • You’ll add quick pulse checks and leader 1:1s with remote employees to catch problems early.
  • You’ll build dashboards that show trends by location and share findings quarterly.

“Document what you change from the data and close the loop with people.”

Conclusion

Conclusion

Fixing this issue starts when leaders choose habits that make remote work normal and fair. Use the clear playbook: define outcomes, train managers, run remote‑first meetings, and document contributions so proximity bias loses its grip.

Model the change—Synchrony Financial’s rule that leaders spend at least one day working from home shows how leadership can set norms. Use segmented data and pulse checks to make progress visible.

Commit to small, steady routines that protect opportunities for remote workers. Keep measuring, celebrate wins, and refine the process so your company rewards results, not who sits nearest the office.

FAQ

What is proximity bias and why should you care in a hybrid workplace?

Proximity bias happens when employees who work in the office get better treatment simply because they are more visible. This affects access to promotions, high-impact projects, and informal mentorship. You should care because it harms retention, reduces fairness, and undermines diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging (DEIB) efforts.

How does this tendency start from unconscious attitudes?

Managers and teams often rely on gut feelings and in-person cues. Without intent, you may favor people you see more often. That unconscious pattern shapes who gets credit, who leads projects, and who appears most engaged.

What are common signs that remote team members are being treated unfairly?

Look for uneven recognition, fewer promotions, missed invites to decision-making meetings, and social exclusion. Remote employees may also face technical barriers during calls and get less access to informal feedback and development opportunities.

How can you tell if performance reviews are skewed toward in-office staff?

Watch for language that praises visibility or presence rather than outcomes. If ratings and raise decisions often favor those in the office despite similar deliverables, your evaluation process likely needs clearer, outcome-based criteria.

What practical steps can you take to make performance criteria fairer?

Define measurable goals, document deliverables, and use objective metrics tied to outcomes. Share expectations publicly, and require managers to justify ratings with examples that focus on impact, not seat time.

How should managers be trained to support remote and hybrid teams?

Train leaders on inclusive remote leadership and unconscious decision patterns. Teach skills like equitable meeting facilitation, remote coaching, and transparent goal-setting so managers treat all team members consistently.

What are remote-first meeting norms you can implement right away?

Use agendas, rotate facilitators, call on quieter participants, enable captions, and insist everyone joins via the same video platform. Share notes and action items afterward so people in other time zones can catch up.

How do asynchronous tools help level the playing field?

Asynchronous tools create a persistent record of work, decisions, and feedback. You can use collaborative docs, recorded updates, and channel-based communication to make contributions visible regardless of location or hours.

What routines build trust between remote workers and managers?

Set regular one-on-ones, agree on predictable check-ins, and use iterative goals with milestones. Clear expectations and frequent, documented feedback reduce uncertainty and show you value outcomes over presence.

How can leaders model inclusive behavior for the whole company?

Leaders should work remote-first at times, rotate in-office schedules, and visibly support equitable policies. When executives demonstrate fair treatment, managers follow and the culture shifts toward inclusion.

What technology investments help prevent unequal treatment of remote employees?

Prioritize secure remote access, reliable video conferencing, cloud collaboration, and shared project dashboards. These tools reduce friction and ensure remote contributors have the same resources as in-office staff.

How do you measure whether your actions reduced unfair treatment by location?

Use pulse surveys segmented by work setting, analyze promotion and assignment data, and track engagement scores over time. Look for closing gaps in recognition, career growth, and participation in strategic projects.

Which metrics should you track to spot disparities in opportunities?

Monitor distribution of high-impact projects, promotion rates, performance ratings, mentorship assignments, and learning budgets by work location. Regularly review these numbers and take corrective action when you see imbalances.

How often should you revisit policies and training to sustain progress?

Reassess policies quarterly and run annual training refreshers. Combine frequent pulse checks with deeper annual audits so you can course-correct quickly and sustain long-term cultural change.

Author

  • Felix Römer

    Felix is the founder of SmartKeys.org, where he explores the future of work, SaaS innovation, and productivity strategies. With over 15 years of experience in e-commerce and digital marketing, he combines hands-on expertise with a passion for emerging technologies. Through SmartKeys, Felix shares actionable insights designed to help professionals and businesses work smarter, adapt to change, and stay ahead in a fast-moving digital world. Connect with him on LinkedIn